Mar 3

OK, I’ll admit I’m not the quickest on the draw on this subject, but when I was forced by circumstance to upgrade to a new computer, an Acer Aspire, I was given a chance to sample the new Microsoft Office 2007 for 60 days for free, before deciding whether to buy. As a writer, of course, it is MS Word 2007 that is the centerpiece of whether I’m going to make this purchase or not.

On first blush, MS Word 2007 is probably the biggest user-interface shift this word processor has ever seen. Rather than overload onscreen real estate with tons of toolbars as has been the norm in past outings since time immemorial, Word 2007 has instead pulled off a radical change of the application’s menu structure, so that things are laid out more visually, and each time you shift from one menu to another, an accompanying toolbar is displayed as part of that menu. It’s a slick design. The program also features much smoother and faster-performing tasks throughout.

The big change, though, that may cause some hiccups is found in the file format shift. All the way through Word 2003 (2005 on the Mac), MS Word documents have, by default, been given the “.doc” extension. All that changes in Word 2007, and it can cause some hiccups for folks working on older versions of MS Word. Although file compatibility patches can be downloaded, the default MS Word format is now: “.docx”

So far, I’m not sure why the shift is even necessary, but like it or not, the change has been made. It’s enough to make you want to kick over your foot of bed TV lifts in frustration, until you realize how much better the new format works when it comes to creating things like labor-saving document templates.

In the end, though, what matters is whether it’s a better tool for writing. In that measure, it most certainly is. One seemingly minor feature I’ve fallen in love with already is the automatic word count that’s displayed at the bottom of the app at all times; no more going to Tools > Word Count to find out whether that term paper has reached 2,600 words yet.

More importantly, it’s easier than ever to set up templates that auto-format your documents to desired specifications with a minimum of interaction once the template’s all set up. That may seem minor for someone who just uses Word to write letters, but for more advanced users, it’s a big improvement. The only down side is that thanks to the format change, any templates you had that worked in prior versions of Word will have to be recreated from scratch… goodbye, “screenplay.dot,” my old friend… hello, “screenplay.dotx,” my new friend!

Add a much needed breakaway from the black-grey-white design of previous MS Word outings, and the new yellow-based startup screen and Window Vista Aero-theme-inspired blue interface of the new MS Word is a more cheerful-looking experience as well, at least initially. Yup; when my free trial ends - perhaps even before - I’m definitely making the purchase and stepping up into MS Word (and MS Office) 2007.

Mar 3

One doesn’t always get Amazon coupons for writing an excellent blog entry, or an excellent script, or even an excellent joke. For real writers, though, writing isn’t just about compensation; it’s about communicating something through storytelling, or, if not exactly storytelling, then through effective written communication of the non-story kind.

I’ve recently taken on a couple huge writing tasks. One is about an 18-month or so commitment to write lessons for my bar and bat mitzvah kids at my messianic temple. That’s turning out to be a growing experience in ways beyond the creative realm. It’s turning me into more of a researcher.

The other is also equally research-related as much as it’s related to writing; I have my first published article coming out soon in the next issue of Ripper Notes. It’s a true crime piece, obviously, and focused on the “last” Ripper victim, Mary Jane Kelly. Now, I’m delving into deeper research and have committed to doing more articles related to Jack the Ripper for that periodical.

Do the two writing commitments seem at odds with each other? I suppose they are to at least some degree, but both are important in this way: they are chances to write, write often, and write well. What writer could resist either offer?

Mar 3

One of the dream assignments that would have me swinging from chandeliers would be the chance to be part of a Joss Whedon-helmed TV show. I enjoy Joss’ vibe and his storytelling structure and rhythm is used and mimicked by other creators as diverse as Alfred Gough and Miles Millar, who took Season Five cues from Whedon on when to kill off Clark’s dad, as well as a Season Six cue on when to do an episode in which Clark wakes up to find himself a “normal boy” in an insane asylum; as well as Bill Lawrence, who took a Season Six cue from Whedon on when to do a musical episode; and even new Doctor Who series show runner Russell T. Davies, who, rather than aping specific episodes, simply structures his seasons with a continuity that is similar to how Whedon structured his television dramas, most notably Buffy the Vampire Slayer.

Whedon’s mind works sharply and efficiently, yet is still brimming with humor and creativity; working on his team would be an education and inspiration. Of course, Buffy, Angel and Firefly are all long-dead; but it now appears Whedon is headed back to television after pouring several years into trying to get a Wonder Woman movie off the ground, with no success.

The new series, which is slated to star Buffy alumn Eliza Dushku, is currently called Dollhouse and is a completely new intellectual property for Whedon. That would provide an interesting opportunity, although the likelihood of a blogger/writer like me being invited to join the show’s script crew with no Hollywood credits to my name? Well, fat chance.

Another new Joss project is Ripper, a proposed 2008 TV movie to air this summer on the BBC, centered around Anthony Stewart Head’s Rupert Giles character from the Buffy-verse. Not to mention he’s involved writing a lot of movies. But TV would be the best way to work with and learn from the man. Ever happen? Not likely.